Errors & Bugs to Fix

[deadip]

I have Indexxx back to the previous version yesterday, but this previous version contains a similar technique on the text lists at the bottom of http://www.indexxx.com/models/?l=z

Does this page render correctly? Do photos popup when hovering the mouse over the model text links at the bottom?yes works fine

[Admin]

I've put a new internal page layout at indexxx. Can you confirm that it renders/shows correctly?

What it should do (as it always was) :
1) Larger photo pops up when hovering over a photoset thumbnail
2) "Free Gallery" in pink hovering over the photoset thumbnail for photosets that have a gallery associated.
3) Photosets with galleries should be clickable.
4) Model links for the photosets should popup a model photo

[yuriyandropov]

The following photo sets:

DDF -> 1by-day->
107hot
6498
6650
6651
6654
6659

are wrongly credited to a group:
Adriana M, Aria Giovanni, Ashley, Claudia Possi, Kathy Blanche, Lolly Cat, Meggi, Niki

They should point only to Aria Giovanni, http://www.indexxx.com/models/1894/aria-giovanni/

[Batman]

fixed :)

[deadip]

Hey yuriyandropov,
Since you like finding Models to merge on this Site, I have an interesting assignment for ya.

I'm only doing Models, that are on Nubiles.net and have a Submitted Model Info Boxes I post in. Nubiles Models are from USA, Europe, Russia, Ukraine, and a few other Countries.

There are a lot of Network Sites NOT listed:
TeenMegaWorld Network
TeenCoreClub Network
Brazzers Network
Bang Bros. Network
Reality Kings Network
Reality Pass Plus Network
HD Porn Pass Network
Hardcore Porn Pass Network
Hush Pass Network
Naughty America Network
Pink Visual Network
Porn Pros Network
Swank Network
Mofos Network
Muffia Network
Mega Site Network and on and on.

All I know is, I have several of those Submitted Model Info Boxes filled with Model Info NOT on this Site. I don't have the time to go through all of those Networks and make Merge Lists like you are doing. Do you have the time to do so???

[yuriyandropov]

Hey yuriyandropov,
Since you like finding Models to merge on this Site, I have an interesting assignment for ya.

I'm only doing Models, that are on Nubiles.net and have a Submitted Model Info Boxes I post in. Nubiles Models are from USA, Europe, Russia, Ukraine, and a few other Countries.

There are a lot of Network Sites NOT listed:
TeenMegaWorld Network
TeenCoreClub Network
Brazzers Network
Bang Bros. Network
Reality Kings Network
Reality Pass Plus Network
HD Porn Pass Network
Hardcore Porn Pass Network
Hush Pass Network
Naughty America Network
Pink Visual Network
Porn Pros Network
Swank Network
Mofos Network
Muffia Network
Mega Site Network and on and on.

All I know is, I have several of those Submitted Model Info Boxes filled with Model Info NOT on this Site. I don't have the time to go through all of those Networks and make Merge Lists like you are doing. Do you have the time to do so???

Dear deadip,

I am not sure what you are asking me to do. Specifically, I do not see Submitted Model Info Boxes on the indexxx site. There is a Submitted Links box on each model page, is that the one you are referring to?

Please feel to PM for a more elaborate description.

As an aside, I do not frequent most of the networks on your list, as I am interested primarily in Czech/Slovak, and to a lesser extent Russian and Hungarian models.

[Batman]

He means "Submitted Model Info" box from modelpages like at http://www.indexxx.com/models/26153/tiffany-sweet/ which is only visible when info is added to it. It's read-only for users by default.

At the moment, it's mostly use by Deadip as a documentation tool to sum websites and aliases in it, on which the associated model appeared. One problem with the box is that the data basically is pure text like a wiki (even though it has structure). In the ideal situation, this text will be transformed to structured data in the form of more advanced submitted links.
Another thing that will be implemented at indexxx, is the differentiation between gallery links and the originating website links (like DDF).

[deadip]

Here lately I have included more Model Info besides just the Aliases and WebSites, that I used to do. Am now including Birthdate, Birthplace, Started Modeling Year, Measurements, Height, Tattoos, Piercings, Official WebSite (if any), Social Network Sites (if any), and DVDs they have done. As seen here for Sammie Rhodes
http://www.indexxx.com/models/3715/sammie-rhodes/

[yuriyandropov]

He means "Submitted Model Info" box from modelpages like at http://www.indexxx.com/models/26153/tiffany-sweet/ which is only visible when info is added to it. It's read-only for users by default.

At the moment, it's mostly use by Deadip as a documentation tool to sum websites and aliases in it, on which the associated model appeared. One problem with the box is that the data basically is pure text like a wiki (even though it has structure). In the ideal situation, this text will be transformed to structured data in the form of more advanced submitted links.
Another thing that will be implemented at indexxx, is the differentiation between gallery links and the originating website links (like DDF).

I now see what he means. I am all for including as much data about the model as possible, but the presentation of this data suffers from a couple of drawbacks.

First of all it seems to be text-based. Ideally the model page should NOT contain any static HTML, all the data has to be server-side database-driven, with page having just CSS and some client-side Javascript only.
Secondly, on a very high-resolution monitor, a long "submitted model info" column pushes down the set covers and results in a lot of white space, not very pretty.
As seen, for example in http://www.indexxx.com/models/3715/sammie-rhodes/.

[Batman]

Here lately I have included more Model Info besides just the Aliases and WebSites, that I used to do. Am now including Birthdate, Birthplace, Started Modeling Year, Measurements, Height, Tattoos, Piercings, Official WebSite (if any), Social Network Sites (if any), and DVDs they have done. As seen here for Sammie Rhodes
http://www.indexxx.com/models/3715/sammie-rhodes/
Nice! :)
Another feature that is on the todo list, is tagging, which allows users to mark/label a model with certain info, like "lesbian".


[...]First of all it seems to be text-based. Ideally the model page should NOT contain any static HTML, all the data has to be server-side database-driven, with page having just CSS and some client-side Javascript only.
The model info data is server-sided, stored as plain text in the db.

Secondly, on a very high-resolution monitor, a long "submitted model info" column pushes down the set covers and results in a lot of white space, not very pretty.
As seen, for example in http://www.indexxx.com/models/3715/sammie-rhodes/.
I agree, it should be fixed now.

[yuriyandropov]

The following sets from 21sx Club Sandy have wrong dates in indexx:

set # __ wrong date __ correct date __ Model
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
100047; 1969-12-31; 2007-08-09; Vica Ryder, Sandy
100049; 1969-12-31; 2007-01-25; Bambi, Eve Angel
100120; 1969-12-31; 2007-09-09; Rita Faltoyano
100225; 1969-12-31; 2007-12-20; Wibeke, Nedra
100235; 1969-12-31; 2008-01-31; Biancka, Sandra Sanchez
100256; 1969-12-31; 2008-03-06; Bonny Bon, Lepidoptera
100324; 0002-11-30; 2008-12-09; Simone Peach, Natalli DiAngelo

Please correct

[yuriyandropov]

The following sets from 21sx Pixandvideo have wrong dates in indexxx:

set # _ wrong date correct date _ Model
---------------------------------------------------------------------

1803; 1969-12-31; 2006-11-09; Jane F.
1804; 1969-12-31; 2006-10-18; Jane F.
1969; 1969-12-31; 2007-04-21; Christina Bella
2005; 1969-12-31; 2007-06-21; Gitta Blond
2116; 1969-12-31; 2007-10-08; Anita Pearl
2120; 1969-12-31; 2007-10-17; Helena G
2161; 1969-12-31; 2007-11-29; Bartscha
2169; 1969-12-31; 2008-01-07; Maya Bee
2171; 1969-12-31; 2008-01-03; Eve Angel
2504; 0002-11-30; 2009-01-10; Sharon Pink
2663; 0002-11-30; 2009-08-21; Angelina Rich


Please correct

[yuriyandropov]

Remove name "Bob Terminator" from the 21sx Assholefever 2010-09-17, set 8338.
Thereafter, delete model entry http://www.indexxx.com/models/32957/bob-terminator/

Remove name Csoky Ice from 21sx Footsiebabes 2010-04-10, set 22239.
Thereafter, delete model entry http://www.indexxx.com/models/27402/csoky-ice/

Thanks.

[yuriyandropov]

Link "Top 100!", http://www.indexxx.com/top/ returns error code HTTP 404: "The requested resource (/top/) is not available."

[bil]

question:
on most of the model pages galleries I click on just a single photo appears on the screen, instead of directing me to the gallery page. Why? It has only recently started doing this.

[Batman]

@Yuri
Thanks, the dates are now corrected. Currently, I can't delete model pages, but they marked to be deleted.

@Bil,
This problem can be caused when Javascript is disabled. Can you confirm whether this is the case? Which browser are you using?

To check your settings, see http://mybrowserinfo.com , look for "JavaScript Enabled". (Note, "JavaScript" is not the same as "Java".)

To test live Javascript code, go to http://www.radit-online.com/code-2/javascript-alert-box/ , and click the "click me" button. When clicked, a window with "Hi, Thanks for learn with us on Radit Blog Online!" should appear.

To modify your settings, see https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=12654

[yuriyandropov]

All MPLStudios "Sophie" sets for 2003-2004 (28 sets) are currently mapped to Barbara, http://www.indexxx.com/models/66/barbara/.
This is in error, as they belong to Sophie Moone, http://www.indexxx.com/models/627/sophie-moone/ .

[bil]

@Bil,
This problem can be caused when Javascript is disabled. Can you confirm whether this is the case? Which browser are you using?

To check your settings, see http://mybrowserinfo.com , look for "JavaScript Enabled". (Note, "JavaScript" is not the same as "Java".)

To test live Javascript code, go to http://www.radit-online.com/code-2/javascript-alert-box/ , and click the "click me" button. When clicked, a window with "Hi, Thanks for learn with us on Radit Blog Online!" should appear.

To modify your settings, see https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=12654

Thanks Batman for the links. My JavaScript is enabled, the window "Hi, Thanks..." comes up and I am using IE7 but still the links goto a single pic. Like I said I have never had this problem before at Indexxx, just recently. Let me know what you think.
thanks

[Batman]

Thanks Batman for the links. My JavaScript is enabled, the window "Hi, Thanks..." comes up and I am using IE7 but still the links goto a single pic. Like I said I have never had this problem before at Indexxx, just recently. Let me know what you think.
thanks
It probably happened when indexxx changed to a more Google-Image-Bot friendly layout. This layout can be a problem for old browsers, and those will get the results that you have:
-All photo-sets are clickable, and behave like a thumbnail. Clicking on it will give a larger photo. Because they are clickable, each thumb of a photo-set is bordered with a blue line.
-The thumbnails won't hover/popup a larger photo when mousing over it.
-If a photo-set has a gallery, than a link to the gallery is shown above the thumb, with the text "Free Gallery". Which should be the case for http://www.indexxx.com/models/37096/anna-10/ . So you should still be able to view galleries.

Also, all browsers with JavaScript disabled, will get the same results.
These results can also appear for new browsers when a page isn't fully downloaded yet. If some page elements aren't loaded, like an external Javascript file from Twitter because Twitter has server problems, than the problem can also appear.

In the case for IE7, I would expect normal behaviour instead of old-browser behaviour.
A quick solution would be to upgrade to IE8, which is also advisable in terms of security on your PC, or to use FireFox or Chrome.

I'll see if I can do some more tests on IE7. (about 5% of the visitors are still using it.)

[Batman]

All MPLStudios "Sophie" sets for 2003-2004 (28 sets) are currently mapped to Barbara, http://www.indexxx.com/models/66/barbara/.
This is in error, as they belong to Sophie Moone, http://www.indexxx.com/models/627/sophie-moone/ .
Fixed :)

[bil]

-If a photo-set has a gallery, than a link to the gallery is shown above the thumb, with the text "Free Gallery". Which should be the case for http://www.indexxx.com/models/37096/anna-10/ . So you should still be able to view galleries.




this is what I get when I try to click on Anna's 'Free Gallery'
http://www.indexxx.com/images/websites/karupspc/22560/pset.jpg
I dont know if it helps, but for some reason I can view some galleries, e.g. I just tried this one
http://www.indexxx.com/galleries/125196/null/ This works fine but when I try another 'free gallery' from the same model I get http://www.indexxx.com/images/websites/allinternal/roxy/pset.jpg
Let me know if you have any suggestions

[yuriyandropov]

Guys,

Many Eromaxx sets have incorrect dates, because you seem to count the date is was released on Tainster as the date. For example, look at the top entries on Tyrannized, http://www.indexxx.com/websites/93/tyrannized/, or CumSquad, http://www.indexxx.com/websites/260/cumsquad/, or PeeSquad, http://www.indexxx.com/websites/261/peesquad/. This is incorrect, as the date of release is simply the date that the old set from Orgymax was made available on the newer Tainster.
Luckily, all eromaxx sets have the date of original release embedded in the set name, so it is safe to run a script where you substr the site prefix, exctract the date and write it out to the db set_date ( or somesuch) field.

Please correct, as it very misleading to see a model, who retired 4 years ago appear in a set dated '2010.

And, speaking of Cumsquad and Peesquad, is there a hope that we'll see ENTIRE CS / PS portfolio on indexx, and nt just the paltry few sets that eromaxx people moved to Tainster? :)

[yuriyandropov]

Why are there two Allwam entries in the website list for Eromaxx, http://www.indexxx.com/websites/84/allwam/ and http://www.indexxx.com/websites/263/allwam2/ ??

This sure confuses the heck out of a lot of people, and makes it more difficult to search. Is there a reason the prevents the merger of these two?

[yuriyandropov]

IMHO it is incorrect to attribute "motley crew" sets, such as DDF 1-By-Day "Jokes" sets to a specific model, despite the fact that the website does that. Such sets contain a variety of random outtake images, where the "cover" model might figure in one or two photos.

Recent example, Zuzana Z., 2011-01-02, 113jks (1by-day.com), where Zuzana is not even on the cover.

I think it is better to leave such sets unattributed, like, say, in sets from publicviolations.com.

[Batman]

this is what I get when I try to click on Anna's 'Free Gallery'
http://www.indexxx.com/images/websites/karupspc/22560/pset.jpg
I dont know if it helps, but for some reason I can view some galleries, e.g. I just tried this one
http://www.indexxx.com/galleries/125196/null/ This works fine but when I try another 'free gallery' from the same model I get http://www.indexxx.com/images/websites/allinternal/roxy/pset.jpg
Let me know if you have any suggestions
I did some tests with IE7, which rendered the site without problems. I don't know why it doesn't on your PC. You can try to download and install Firefox webbrowser (http://www.firefox.com), or upgrade IE7 to IE8 via Windows update.

If correct, if you click right on top (and not next or nearby) at http://www.indexxx.com/images/mindex/free-gallery.gif (which is hovered above the photo set that have a gallery), then you should see the gallery. But if you click a few pixels away from the photo set image, then the photo set image will show it's large version.

[bil]

I did some tests with IE7, which rendered the site without problems. I don't know why it doesn't on your PC. You can try to download and install Firefox webbrowser (http://www.firefox.com), or upgrade IE7 to IE8 via Windows update.

If correct, if you click right on top (and not next or nearby) at http://www.indexxx.com/images/mindex/free-gallery.gif (which is hovered above the photo set that have a gallery), then you should see the gallery. But if you click a few pixels away from the photo set image, then the photo set image will show it's large version.

yeah, I just noticed that myself (the pixel thing), I didnt realise sooner because that wasnt always the case, like I keep saying this problem has only been recent. Never the less thats as good as it gets unless I upgrade to FF or IE8, I cant complain; and thanks for making the effort and taking the time Batman.

[Batman]

Why are there two Allwam entries in the website list for Eromaxx, http://www.indexxx.com/websites/84/allwam/ and http://www.indexxx.com/websites/263/allwam2/ ??

This sure confuses the heck out of a lot of people, and makes it more difficult to search. Is there a reason the prevents the merger of these two?
There were some problems with the site, I'll put it on the todo list.

[Batman]

Guys,

Many Eromaxx sets have incorrect dates, because you seem to count the date is was released on Tainster as the date. For example, look at the top entries on Tyrannized, http://www.indexxx.com/websites/93/tyrannized/, or CumSquad, http://www.indexxx.com/websites/260/cumsquad/, or PeeSquad, http://www.indexxx.com/websites/261/peesquad/. This is incorrect, as the date of release is simply the date that the old set from Orgymax was made available on the newer Tainster.
Luckily, all eromaxx sets have the date of original release embedded in the set name, so it is safe to run a script where you substr the site prefix, exctract the date and write it out to the db set_date ( or somesuch) field.

Please correct, as it very misleading to see a model, who retired 4 years ago appear in a set dated '2010.

And, speaking of Cumsquad and Peesquad, is there a hope that we'll see ENTIRE CS / PS portfolio on indexx, and nt just the paltry few sets that eromaxx people moved to Tainster? :)




Why are there two Allwam entries in the website list for Eromaxx, http://www.indexxx.com/websites/84/allwam/ and http://www.indexxx.com/websites/263/allwam2/ ??

This sure confuses the heck out of a lot of people, and makes it more difficult to search. Is there a reason the prevents the merger of these two?
There were some problems with the site, I'll put it on the todo list.

[Batman]

IMHO it is incorrect to attribute "motley crew" sets, such as DDF 1-By-Day "Jokes" sets to a specific model, despite the fact that the website does that. Such sets contain a variety of random outtake images, where the "cover" model might figure in one or two photos.

Recent example, Zuzana Z., 2011-01-02, 113jks (1by-day.com), where Zuzana is not even on the cover.

I think it is better to leave such sets unattributed, like, say, in sets from publicviolations.com.
I agree, also put on the todo list.

[yuriyandropov]

Batman,

Thank you for your replies to my posts here and in adjacent threads. I will now hold my breath and count down the time when some of these things get fixed. With the pace of recent improvement, I know it won't be long. :)

[yuriyandropov]

Some bugs:

1. From indexxx HOME choosing Models -> Show models by website, Dream Honies and clicking filter ...
yields just one model - Gilda Roberts.

2. Some male models keep showing up because some HC sets are incorrectly marked up to include a male model.
For example:

Dmitro, http://www.indexxx.com/models/26838/dmitro/
George, http://www.indexxx.com/models/8654/george/
George Uhl, http://www.indexxx.com/models/27328/george-uhl/
Jean Fourne, http://www.indexxx.com/models/26840/jean-fourne/
Kid Jamaica, http://www.indexxx.com/models/28285/kid-jamaica/
Nick Lang, http://www.indexxx.com/models/27407/nick-lang/
Renato, http://www.indexxx.com/models/32839/renato/

Perhaps, first removing a male from the set, will allow to subsequently delete the male model db record.

3. Some psets with female models have repeated model name, with the hyperlink appearing as the second name.
For example:

Lake Russel - http://www.indexxx.com/models/34520/lake-russel/
Lake Russell- http://www.indexxx.com/models/10600/lake-russell/

Niki Vonn - http://www.indexxx.com/models/35663/niki-vonn/
Niki Voss - http://www.indexxx.com/models/34635/niki-voss/


4. 2-model set eurogirlsongirls.com 013al (2010-08-23) has hyperlinks reversed. Because of this, model Justine incorrectly points to http://www.indexxx.com/models/26779/catina-2/, should point to http://www.indexxx.com/models/29543/melika/.
To confuse matters even more, the model page of Justine, though having correct photos is incorrectly titled as "Melika"
Correct title should be JUSTINE, aka RAVEN
The "real" Melika, aka Catina on set 013al should point to http://www.indexxx.com/models/26779/catina-2/.

5. Not technically a bug, but still...
a/ Sets of sexy-babes.tv, though followed by indexx , prematurely ends in indexxx on 2009-04-03, i.e. not current
b/ Sites bigassadventure.com and bangbrosworldwide.com are empty

[Batman]

Some bugs:

1. From indexxx HOME choosing Models -> Show models by website, Dream Honies and clicking filter ...
yields just one model - Gilda Roberts.
I'll put this on the todo list.


2. Some male models keep showing up because some HC sets are incorrectly marked up to include a male model.
For example:

Dmitro, http://www.indexxx.com/models/26838/dmitro/
George, http://www.indexxx.com/models/8654/george/
George Uhl, http://www.indexxx.com/models/27328/george-uhl/
Jean Fourne, http://www.indexxx.com/models/26840/jean-fourne/
Kid Jamaica, http://www.indexxx.com/models/28285/kid-jamaica/
Nick Lang, http://www.indexxx.com/models/27407/nick-lang/
Renato, http://www.indexxx.com/models/32839/renato/

Perhaps, first removing a male from the set, will allow to subsequently delete the male model db record.


3. Some psets with female models have repeated model name, with the hyperlink appearing as the second name.
For example:

Lake Russel - http://www.indexxx.com/models/34520/lake-russel/
Lake Russell- http://www.indexxx.com/models/10600/lake-russell/

Niki Vonn - http://www.indexxx.com/models/35663/niki-vonn/
Niki Voss - http://www.indexxx.com/models/34635/niki-voss/

This will probably be fixed when the new version of indexxx is ready.


4. 2-model set eurogirlsongirls.com 013al (2010-08-23) has hyperlinks reversed. Because of this, model Justine incorrectly points to http://www.indexxx.com/models/26779/catina-2/, should point to http://www.indexxx.com/models/29543/melika/.
To confuse matters even more, the model page of Justine, though having correct photos is incorrectly titled as "Melika"
Correct title should be JUSTINE, aka RAVEN
The "real" Melika, aka Catina on set 013al should point to http://www.indexxx.com/models/26779/catina-2/.
DDF seems to have used the wrong model photo, but this cannot be ruled out until DDF sets appear that have solos of those models, or sets that mutually exclude them.



5. Not technically a bug, but still...
a/ Sets of sexy-babes.tv, though followed by indexx , prematurely ends in indexxx on 2009-04-03, i.e. not current
b/ Sites bigassadventure.com and bangbrosworldwide.com are empty
Bigassadventure seems to be seperate from bangbros updates list, and therefor not included at indexxx. But they are candicates to be included.
Sexy-babes is one of those sites that buy content from content providers. One problem with those sites is that they cause duplicated sets with Karups. There's no clear solution for this at the moment. ATK Kingdom might also have duplicated content, but is also a candicate for indexxx.

[Batman]

There was a delay problem when posting messages, but that problem is now fixed :)

[yuriyandropov]

4. 2-model set eurogirlsongirls.com 013al (2010-08-23) has hyperlinks reversed. Because of this, model Justine incorrectly points to http://www.indexxx.com/models/26779/catina-2/, should point to http://www.indexxx.com/models/29543/melika/.
To confuse matters even more, the model page of Justine, though having correct photos is incorrectly titled as "Melika"
Correct title should be JUSTINE, aka RAVEN
The "real" Melika, aka Catina on set 013al should point to http://www.indexxx.com/models/26779/catina-2/.




DDF seems to have used the wrong model photo, but this cannot be ruled out until DDF sets appear that have solos of those models, or sets that mutually exclude them.




No need to wait for DDF. Here's where the got the content from:
Melika http://adultlabs.com/sets.php?by=1258721458
Justine http://adultlabs.com/sets.php?by=1257412288

If you turn to page 2 of their profiles you'll see the eurogirlsongirls.com set in question.

[Batman]

No need to wait for DDF. Here's where the got the content from:
Melika http://adultlabs.com/sets.php?by=1258721458
Justine http://adultlabs.com/sets.php?by=1257412288

If you turn to page 2 of their profiles you'll see the eurogirlsongirls.com set in question.
Thanks for the info. I cannot fix it at the moment due to some limitations at indexxx. I'll take notes of it.

[deadip]

Batman
You need to remove Lira @ Teen Dreams from this Model's Page
http://www.indexxx.com/models/15455/sophia-sutra/#

Sophia Sutra is a USA Model NOT FROM Russia like Lira is.

[Batman]

Batman
[...]Sophia Sutra is a USA Model NOT FROM Russia like Lira is.
Currently the splitting a page to a new page feature is a bit broken. I'll take notes of it. If you find another page of her, than I can merge her to it.

[deadip]

Currently the splitting a page to a new page feature is a bit broken. I'll take notes of it. If you find another page of her, than I can merge her to it.Let me know, if I'm understanding this correctly, ok??? You are saying the only way you can remove an incorrect Alias and WebSite is by finding another Model Page, where that Alias and WebSite is correct, that you can then Merge that incorrect Entry to the correct Model Page right??? Otherwise, I do NOT understand what you mean as the rest of Sophia Sutra's Model Page is correct, except for that one Entry I listed in my Post of #286.

What if there isn't another Model Page, that Incorrect Alias and WebSite of Lira @ Teen Dreams can be Merged to???

I have no idea how you got your Site set-up to catch these Models and WebSites. I sure wish I did and understood fully how it works, so I can at least try to help you find a solution to this apparent Error you have.

[Batman]

The feature is now fixed :)
And the pages are split:
http://www.indexxx.com/models/15455/sophia-sutra/
http://www.indexxx.com/models/39026/lira-1/

[deadip]

I think another thing we should get fixed is the Tags on the List of Sites the Model appears on. For Example let's take Nubiles Model Dagmar

Here is how she her WebSites are listed on EuroBabeIndex
http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/dagmar_2.html
Country Flag ... Russian Federation........................................ ....Dagmar........................................ ..............
Also known as
Ally, Ksenya A., Olia, Olia M., Olya, Olya M., Ona

Web
beautifulnude.biz (solo)
domai.com (solo)
femjoy.com (solo, lez)
met-art.com (solo)
metmodels.com (solo)
nubileones.com
nubiles.net (solo)
pretty4ever.com (solo, lez)

Now, when I started using your New Feature of Add A WebSite here recently I was including the Tags next to the WebSites I was listing for a Model. So, instead of having a separate Box for Tags wouldn't it be more informative to include the Tags next to the WebSite they appear on??? That way everyone knows what kind of Content that Model has done on that Site.

Just a suggestion to improve the looks of your Model Index Site.

[Batman]

I think another thing we should get fixed is the Tags on the List of Sites the Model appears on. For Example let's take Nubiles Model Dagmar
[...]
There are a number of options that can be implemented:
-tags associated to a model (model-tag) The currently implemented using the "Tags" box.
-tags associated to a photo/video-set (set-tag). Not implemented.
-tags associated to a website (website-tag). Not implemented.
-tags associated to a model in combination with a website (model-website-tag). Implemented by using the "Add A Website" link, although not as wel implemented as the model-tags.

In the ideal scenario, all type of tags would be implemented, but the set-tags would probably not be used very often, because there are too many sets.
The reason why model-tags are separate from website-model-tags is that there are tags that can be associated to all websites of a model. For example a "tattoo" tag of a model. If this would be associated once for every website of a model (as model-website-tags), than it would cause the data to be redudant.

So model-tags are also needed; they are used for model specific data only. Although some of those tags might play a double role (and might be a bit redundant), for example: a "b/g" tag as a website-model-tag indicates that a model has performed b/g action at the website. And a "b/g" tag as a model-tag indicates that the model performs b/g action in general. In this last case the tag is a bit redundant in the sense that it can be calculated from the model-website-tags of a model. But a quick implementation of the last case, might cause performance problems, so it isn't implemented at the the moment.

Development of Indexxx is also limited by the current architecture of it's web part/layer. We're investing in a new architecture, but that will take some time.

[deadip]

There are a number of options that can be implemented:
-tags associated to a model (model-tag) The currently implemented using the "Tags" box.
-tags associated to a photo/video-set (set-tag). Not implemented.
-tags associated to a website (website-tag). Not implemented.
-tags associated to a model in combination with a website (model-website-tag). Implemented by using the "Add A Website" link, although not as wel implemented as the model-tags.

In the ideal scenario, all type of tags would be implemented, but the set-tags would probably not be used very often, because there are too many sets.
The reason why model-tags are separate from website-model-tags is that there are tags that can be associated to all websites of a model. For example a "tattoo" tag of a model. If this would be associated once for every website of a model (as model-website-tags), than it would cause the data to be redudant.

So model-tags are also needed; they are used for model specific data only. Although some of those tags might play a double role (and might be a bit redundant), for example: a "b/g" tag as a website-model-tag indicates that a model has performed b/g action at the website. And a "b/g" tag as a model-tag indicates that the model performs b/g action in general. In this last case the tag is a bit redundant in the sense that it can be calculated from the model-website-tags of a model. But a quick implementation of the last case, might cause performance problems, so it isn't implemented at the the moment.

Development of Indexxx is also limited by the current architecture of it's web part/layer. We're investing in a new architecture, but that will take some time.Your Model Index Site already includes the Model's Name with the WebSite they appear on and the number of times the Model appears on that WebSite, which is more than what most of the other Model Index Sites use now. So, your Model Indexxx Site is already more informative than any Other Model Index Site.

I disagree with your Ideal Scenario where Tags need to be used for the Model and all the Photo/Video Sets. I believe just implementing the Tags associated to a WebSite is all that is necessary, because when John Q. Public comes to your Model Indexxx Site looking for a Model.

So, In General, he is looking for that particular Model from a WebSite, that he got the Model's Name from. It isn't until John Q. Public arrives on your Model Indexxx Site, when he sees all the Other Model Names, that Model may be named, if applicable. Take me for example, when I come here sometimes looking for a Nubiles Model, I'm looking first for Other WebSites, that Nubiles Model appears on, second what Other Names, and third what Other Kinds of Work, that Model has done.

Therefore, to eliminate anything being redundant as far as Tags go. Only Tags associated to a WebSite is all that is truly necessary, because with those Tags you catch all the Other Associated Tags (Model & Photo/Video Sets) all in one Tag.

[Batman]

...
In your situation/scenario, I agree that the model-tags (Tags box) are completely unnecessary, but there are people visiting indexxx that are using other scenario's. For example, a user directly visiting a model page via another website that is linking directly to that model. This user might be interested in the model because she has some specific characteristics, like big-tits, skin color, weight etc. These users can click on model-tags to find similar models in which they might be interested.

Another scenario might be this: a user is trying to find a model of which he/she has forgotten the name, but of which he/she knows some specific characteristics. In that case, the user can narrow the search space using model-tags. These characteristics can be like: eye color, weight, country, ethnicity, tattoo, breast-size, skin color. So these tags can contain biographical data, some similar to the data found in the model-info-boxes. One key difference is that tags can be made from user input, and that new tags can be created/invented by users.

There are also other uses of indexxx used by visitors.

[Batman]

Originally Posted by yuriyandropov View Post
No need to wait for DDF. Here's where the got the content from:
Melika http://adultlabs.com/sets.php?by=1258721458
Justine http://adultlabs.com/sets.php?by=1257412288

If you turn to page 2 of their profiles you'll see the eurogirlsongirls.com set in question.

Thanks for the info. I cannot fix it at the moment due to some limitations at indexxx. I'll take notes of it.
fixed

[yuriyandropov]

Seems like MetModels do not maintain "unique" model names. As a result, during recent "acquisition" of MetModels whenever model had a "common" name the indexxx page would often end up with two or more unrelated models on the same page. Here are few examples:

1. Page http://www.indexxx.com/models/41193/jamine-1/ erroneously contains pset MAG_84_200607 of a different model, "Jana M", http://www.indexxx.com/models/2687/jana-m/

2. Page http://www.indexxx.com/models/41194/jana-7/ has several unrelated models grouped togetether. Of them, one set, MAG_98_200610, is Jana Mrazkova/Tereza Ilova, http://www.indexxx.com/models/668/tereza-ilova/,
Three sets, MAG_139_200709, MAG_113_200609 and MAG_31_200601 is Jana Mrhacova, http://www.indexxx.com/models/1579/joana-redgrave/

3. Page http://www.indexxx.com/models/41603/radka-1/ has several unrelated models grouped togetether. Of them, one set, MR_17_200607 is Radka Varna, http://www.indexxx.com/models/87/bridget/

4. Page http://www.indexxx.com/models/41014/dasha-5/ has several unrelated models grouped togetether.

5. Page http://www.indexxx.com/models/41775/vicky-1/ has several unrelated models grouped togetether. Of them, one set, TF_39_200703 Vicky is Angel Dark, http://www.indexxx.com/models/43/angel-dark/

[Batman]

@Yuriy
This problem of MetModels makes identification difficult. For these incorrect pages, the sets have to be fixed on per-set bases.
I have just fixed the ID-ed models of your post.

[deadip]

The problem with Met Models Yuri is the Photographers don't communicate with each other. One Photographer will do a shoot with a Model and name her a name of his or her own desire, then an entirely different Photographer will do a shoot with the exact same Model and then name her whatever he or she desires to name her. Met Models is actually one Site where the WebMaster doesn't name the Models. That's the problem with the Site of Met Models.

[Batman]

The new/just released Firefox 4 doesn't close the model comment windows, model submit link window, and login window.... Firefox 3, IE9 and Chrome don't have this problem.
This further increases the urge of a new web layer architecture of indexxx on which we are working.

[yuriyandropov]

Alica of Simonscans is incorrectly attributed to Elisa, http://www.indexxx.com/models/3769/elisa-1/

Correct attribution is Mia aka Mia R., http://www.indexxx.com/models/16518/mia-18/

[Batman]

Well spotted, it's now fixed.

[yuriyandropov]

Indexx page http://www.indexxx.com/models/25428/kia-kovicova/ inccorrectly attributes set 5420, 2005-06-10 to Kia Kovicova aka Kia Winston aka Kristina Blond. It's not your fault, the same error is present on Twistys site, but I am quite confident that the model on 5420 set is not Kia Winston. It is unfortunate that incorrect photo serves as a title page for Kia.
Please split set 5420 from the rest of the twistys sets and merge
http://www.indexxx.com/models/25428/kia-kovicova/ with
http://www.indexxx.com/models/344/kristina-blond/

[Batman]

fixed.
The other "Kia Kovicova" is put on this page: http://www.indexxx.com/models/48726/kia-kovicova-1/

[Loso]

Please attribute this Anal Teen Angels set (72172 from 2011-10-09) to Malia (http://www.indexxx.com/models/28389/malia-2/).

http://21sextury.com/scene/72172/Anal_teen_angel_Malia/

Loso

[Batman]

Thanks for reporting, she is now mapped to the set.

[Loso]

Scene 96 on TeenSexMovs is mapped to Arina D. (http://www.indexxx.com/models/24666/karlie-4/), when it's actually Sabrina B. (http://www.indexxx.com/models/15104/philipina/)

This is the proof:

http://galleries.teensexmovs.com/113813561/
http://galleries.teensexmovs.com/516811427/
http://galleries.teensexmovs.com/900812550/
http://galleries.teensexmovs.com/951810159/

Loso

[Batman]

fixed

[Loso]

Scene 77023 on AnalQueenAlysa was only credited to Alysa Gap:

http://t2.analqueenalysa.com/scene/77023?nats=#CONTENT_TOP

The other girl in the scene is Lisa Musa (as Miranda).

http://www.indexxx.com/models/21435/lisa-musa/

Loso

[Loso]

Please attribute scene barbara_and_blonda on nubilegirlshd.com (2011-10-23) to Claire (http://www.indexxx.com/models/6067/claire-1/) & Alexa (http://www.indexxx.com/models/2042/alexa-2/).

Loso

[Loso]

Please attribute scene heidi_angel on nubilegirlshd.com (2011-11-19) to Amber (http://www.indexxx.com/models/6228/amber-3/) & Jilana (http://www.indexxx.com/models/20360/jilana/).

Loso

[Loso]

Please attribute scene britney_hardcore on nubilegirlshd.com (2011-11-22) to Brittany (http://www.indexxx.com/models/10895/brittany-4/).

Loso

[Batman]

fixed

[Loso]

Please attribute this scene to Nastie (http://www.indexxx.com/models/24651/nastie/) & Olena (http://www.indexxx.com/models/49529/olena-2/).

http://www.indexxx.com/galleries/144064/null/

Loso

[Batman]

fixed

[bil]

I often get problem when trying to Add to My Babes.
A blank page comes up with the words:

Internal error
return to home page


Can you help?

[Batman]

Thanks for reporting, it's now fixed (if correct). There was a bug in the model merge process.

The problem occurred in the following situation: Assume there are two different model pages and you have both pages added to MyBabes. If later these pages are merged and even later you click the "Add to My Babes" link on the merged page (a page that was already added to your MyBabes), then the error "Internal error" will occur instead of a message like "She was already added to your My Babes list". But now that it is fixed (if correctly), it will show "She was already added to your My Babes list" in this situation.

[drdave]

there's an awful lot of women that indexxx claims have two names at teendreams.
today i decided to check this
teendreams model pages have Charlie Laine as Charlie but not Patricia
i'm afraid there may be a problem...
anybody know about this?
i will edit this post if i find more.

also if results are positive

http://www.indexxx.com/models/513/nikita-g/
teendreams.com Joanne - indeterminate, too many joannes
teendreams.com Nicola - found
teendreams.com Lolitta - found

http://www.indexxx.com/models/5916/satin-bloom/
teendreams.com Melissa - dont see satin's face
teendreams.com Satin - there she is
teendreams.com Veronika - this veronika: http://content.teendreams.com/tour.php?go=pic&model=6943&set=16360&item=0002.jpg is a close match but not on eye color, nose piercing

http://www.indexxx.com/models/12686/jesse-capelli/
teendreams.com (10) Bobby - it's her
teendreams.com (2) Jenny - 99% match to bobby
teendreams.com (1) Jessie 100% match to jenny

[Batman]

@drdave,
I have just verified them, they all should be correct.
"Veronika" is an alias added by a user. (This can be seen by a missing number between parentheses after the alias name.)
Here: http://members.teendreams.com/members/cms/model/view/i=6353 she is listed as "Veronika", so this entry is also correct.

"Joanne" is correct. Verified it in the member area.

"Melissa" is Satin. See the birthmarks.

This: http://members.teendreams.com/members/cms/set/view/set=6620:model=3713:type=P is the page of Charlie being called "Patricia".

So Teendreams can have multiple model pages (and thus also multiple names) of a single model.

[drdave]

okay, good, you guys have members only info. that's one of the things i was wondering

also i wonder, do you all eyeball the user-submitted info for accuracy? i include my own submissions in that question.
does "change" sometimes change to "edit?" do user-submitted aliases ever get deleted?

in other words, how do i know what to take as indexxx gospel and what to be wary of?


@drdave,
I have just verified them, they all should be correct.
"Veronika" is an alias added by a user. (This can be seen by a missing number between parentheses after the alias name.)
Here: http://members.teendreams.com/members/cms/model/view/i=6353 she is listed as "Veronika", so this entry is also correct.

"Joanne" is correct. Verified it in the member area.

"Melissa" is Satin. See the birthmarks.

This: http://members.teendreams.com/members/cms/set/view/set=6620:model=3713:type=P is the page of Charlie being called "Patricia".

So Teendreams can have multiple model pages (and thus also multiple names) of a single model.

[Batman]

okay, good, you guys have members only info. that's one of the things i was wondering

also i wonder, do you all eyeball the user-submitted info for accuracy? i include my own submissions in that question.
does "change" sometimes change to "edit?" do user-submitted aliases ever get deleted?

in other words, how do i know what to take as indexxx gospel and what to be wary of?
Only merge requests are verified, but user-submitted info, such as on which website a model appeared, isn't. It would also be very difficult, because sometimes membership access is required to verify such info. The best thing is to let the community at indexxx correct such data.
But we do have all data to stepwise revert all actions performed on data submitted or modified by users.

[drdave]

one more question. i see what you mean about the number in parens. but some user-submitted websites/names are editable while others are changeable. why is that?


Only merge requests are verified, but user-submitted info, such as on which website a model appeared, isn't. It would also be very difficult, because sometimes membership access is required to verify such info. The best thing is to let the community at indexxx correct such data.
But we do have all data to stepwise revert all actions performed on data submitted or modified by users.

[Batman]

one more question. i see what you mean about the number in parens. but some user-submitted websites/names are editable while others are changeable. why is that?
The links all now all named "edit" instead of "edit" and "change".